![](airstrip/Jim.gif)
Hi, I'm Jim...
Know me as Gemineye
Jim or Jim Gemineye. Anything, as long as it's not Jim Gemineye
chéri! On the other hand, Eric is a nice name..
BLAIR'S MILLENNIUM
Eric Blair wrote
the book 1984 using the pen name GEORGE ORWELL. Like all good
science fiction 1984 dealt not so much with fanciful illusions
about the future, but about his own perceptions of his time (1948).
Writers sometimes have to use outlandish contexts in order to
break the barriers of preconceptions that readers put up. However,
in creating this new context, he explored several ideas that
we could apply to other eras and also see come to fruition in
this new millennium.
- Telescreen - we thought this was
his view of the new medium of TV being used to brainwash the
masses. That was before digital TV came along. Digital TV will
evolve - it will be on all the time, it will be two way - the
TV in the bedroom will have to go.
- Newspeak - Didn't quiet get this
right. The idea was destroy the ability to express unorthodox
ideas by destroying the language required to communicate them.
This was done by simplification. Well, if anything, language
has become even more complex. But some might argue that corruption
of words like cool and wicked accomplish the same thing as Newspeak.
On the other hand with the creation of a drug culture'
do you need Newspeak? If you're on the right drugs you can drivel
on for hours without saying anything meaningful - let alone radical.
- Chocolate
rations
- Not quite sure why chocolate rations figured so much in Orwell's
vision. It was used as a kind of reward or punishment. If news
was bad, chocolate rations were reduced - if news was good, chocolate
rations were increased. It was as if the people were held to
blame for events in Airstrip One, We don't have chocolate rations
now - but we do have interest rates.
Airstrip One
was the new name for England or Britain under the regime of Big
Brother.
Welcome
to Airstrip One.
Welcome to a
different kind of spin... it's less gassy and leaves no bitter
after-taste.
Welcome
to the
NEW MILLENNIUM.
If you
have any comments to make on Gemineye's content email: jim@gemineye.free-online.co.uk |
WILL BLAIR EVER ADOPT
A SENSIBLE POSITION ON EUROPE?![](airstrip/BlairsPosture.gif)
I ask questions like that in a month I'm
feeling foolish
FREE TRADE or SLAVE TRADE?![World Trade Organization FAQ](airstrip/WTO.gif)
![Airstrip One Archive](airstrip/Archive.gif)
![Euro-Mad](airstrip/EuroBanana.gif)
|
NEWS STORIES FROM
ANOTHER PLANET:
- USA sends humanitarian aid to
Mozambique - but later withdraws when they couldn't find anything
to bomb.
- Trade Secretary Stephen Byers
says £50 for a bottle of tomato sauce is far too cheap,
Britain is not ripping you off - these tomatoes are flown from
Argentina to the USA where they're pureed and from there they
go to Spain where they are bottled and then we buy them from
a wholesaler in France - £50 doesn't even cover the air
freight! An official said later: He's fully recovered now.
- WTO insists Britain must grow
bananas, but British farmers complain that they can't grow them
straight enough for EU standards. Caribbean's are told to diversify
into Whelks - which can be sold in Skegness at triple the price
of local produce.
- European Parliament outlaws
all parties that reject European Federalism.
- Inflation is up - So interest
rates are set to rise again. This will push up the cost of mortgages
- which will push up inflation figures which include mortgage
payments - Inflation is up - people are spending too much - So
interest rates are set to rise again...
Well it's time to leave the magic
roundabout - bye bye - till next year.
![](Resources/crup.gif)
GREENGRASS FOR
MAYOR
It's a weird world. Take Frank
Dobson, Tony Blair loves him and the press hate him. As for Ken
Livingstone, Tony Blair hates him and the press love him. But
the love/hate bit is irrelevant really. It's about where the
focus is...
There are several other candidates
standing for Mayor - let's see what are their names? So the focus
in this contest is between a Labour Mayor and a Labour Mayor.
Reassuring to know that democracy thrives in London. It's a weird
world, but it could be weirder...
Greengrass
is the name, an and I'm standing for Mayor of London. I'm the
best man for the job, any fool can see that. And so what if there's
a few quid in it for me. As long as everybody does all right
out of it, there's no harm done like is there? I've got some
great ideas - that Milleniumium Dome thing, we can fill that
with gold, the ba Bank of Englands selling it off cheap - an
all that Euro lot are dumpin the stuff as well. No ones buying
nowt, cept the Dutch, so there'll be rich pickings. I mean,
someones gonta get it cheap, so's it might as well be us. And
while it's sittin there we can charge people a few bob to come
and look at it. One of my better ideas don't ya think? As for
transport, well I also know somewhere you can get a few bicycles
cheap. You know, I think I'm on to a winner here.
In the end I think it won't matter
who we vote for, we'll somehow end up with Greengrass. A year
from now we'll be howling for their blood. Just look across the
Atlantic, when was the last time New York city had a Mayor that
wasn't accused of corruption or incompetence?
![](Resources/crdn.gif)
|
BARCLAYS DOWNSIZES
The latest TV advertising for
Barclays Bank is a bit ironic don't you think? At a time it is
fawning over bigness, it is closing down 172 branches.
Possibly it find's itself getting
too... let's see - what's the word...
And possibly it is right. If
it is too big to run local banks profitably, then it has no business
running them. Best leave it to a smaller bank that can.
ARE WE READY?
A misleading question. I keep
hearing that we are only to join the Euro when the time is right.
A bit like asking someone to marry you and being told "I'm
not ready for that yet". We all know that means: NO. They
are just to timid to admit it.
There is no question of ever
being 'ready'. It is an ideological step: do we want to be apart
of a super state or not. YES or NO, being ready has nothing to
do with it. It is NOT a question of economics. If it were, there
would never be a 'right' time. If changing economic factors here
or in Europe make being a part of a super state undesirable -
then there will be a time, if we are part of a super state, when
it will be undesirable again. What goes around, comes around.
So I have to ask... If there
is only a moment when the time is right, why is Government preparing
to take us on an irreversible path that is forever?
You only need remember one thing,
people who marry for economic reasons often regret it. |